Scarlet Letter :: essays research papers

Controversy between specie and Loveas shown in The Rocking-Horse Winner The Rocking-Horse Winner is couched in the symbols of the antediluvian patriarch myths. The spawn is poor, unsatisfied fairy princess who yearns for happiness Paul is the gallant gymnastic horse on horse-back who rides to her rescue (Junkins 261). The mythical aspect of the written report is evident in the style and symbols. In the opening lines, the head start seven expressions take away a fable-like quality reminiscent of any number of fairy princess tales, only the word advantages locates us in the atmosphere of the modern world, so does the word luck (Junkins 261). The r all(prenominal) of the symbolism is overwhelming, in nigh sense the story is about its literal, narrative level the life of the family that chooses money instead of some more stable value, takes money as its nexus of affection. The first fault lay with the mother (Snodgrass 117).There was a beautiful cleaning woman who started wit h all the advantages, yet she had no luck. She married for love, and the love turned to dust. She had decorous children, yet she felt they had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them (Lawrence 1). The story continues to rank us of Hester, who is unable to love her children and is obsessed with money. Only she herself knew that at the gist of her heart was a hard little place that could not smell love, no, not for anybody.(Lawrence 1) There were many problems in the household, one of which was a insufficiency of love from the mother. As Lawrence wrote Only she herself and her children themselves, knew it was not so. They read it in each others eyes (Lawrence 1). During a conversation, Pauls mother mentions that luck is, what causes you to have money. If youre lucky you have money. Thats why its better to be born lucky than large. If youre rich you may loose your money. But if youre lucky you will eer get more Forbes 2money.(Lawrence 1). The situation is then made wo rse by assuming that her misfortunes were caused by her marriage to an unlucky husband. The father is intelligibly a failure as a provider and family-head, so ofttimes that we are scarcely conscious of his existence. And his failure is aggravated by the game social position the family tries to maintain (Koban 280). Lawrence tells us the mother had a diminished income, and the father had a small income, but not nearly copious for the social position which they had to keep up.