Poems by Blake and Wordsworth Essay

Two aspects of London as shown done a response to poems by Blake and Wordsworth.When comparing Blake and Wordsworths pieces, the respective perspectives of the authors should never be utmost from our thoughts. Whereas Blake lived in London his whole life and r atomic number 18ly ventured outside its borders, Wordsworth was a rural person whose only experiences of London came from picayune visits. Unaccustomed to the hustle and bustle of City life, Wordsworth led a relatively relaxed existence which perhaps accounts for his romantic and gentile style. We should not be impress to see that Blake, a frequenter of the less-desirable districts of the capital, offers a far more misanthropic portrayal of London.Blakes poem is a social commentary which points an despicable finger at the industrialist pioneers and the flaws of Industrial society. Blake was a renowned radical of the season with far-reaching humors. He intakes many literary devices to impart his opinions upon his audi ence. This is superbly demonstrated when he writesI wander through each chartered streetThe grapheme is a metaphorical reflection on Blakes perception that anything and every(prenominal)thing is for deal in an industrial society and, in particular, in its impoverished argonas. repetition is clearly employed when the piece claimsIn every cry of every man,In every infants cry of fear,In every voice, in every ban,The mind-forged manacles I hearThe repetition could be equated with anything from the machinery at work in the factories and mills, to an assault of stabbing pain upon those suffering in poverty. Within the framework which Blake creates, the reader is left to determine his own idea of what the repetition may represent, and this is at the centre of the verses success.irony is employed with great effect in the verse beginning How the chimney-sweepers cry. The author contrasts the poverty and ill-health of chimney-sweeps with the wealth of the church, and suggests that instea d of helping the low-down the church pays them a pittance to work in hazardous conditions. Irony oft stands side by side with black humour, and both are well-demonstrated in this verse. The amusing of the reader with a subject which should not amuse serves to set ahead draw them into the piece.In the latter part of the same verse, emotive comparisons are made between the plight of Londons less-fortunate and warfare. Blakes use of the word soldiers is no accident here for soldiers are tools of war, and must shake off opponents. This leads the reader to ask with whom are the soldiers at war? As Marx foretold and the cut Revolution demonstrated, the working classes and those controlling the means of production operate with argue aims. Blake brings a new element of severity to the situation by suggesting that forces are at work against the poor subjects.INSERT LAST VERSE password HEREWordsworth is blissfully unaware of the scenes which Blake paints. Indeed, Wordsworths London is so far removed from Blakes that one is led to ask whether the two are writing of the same city at all. There is a prodigious period of time between the two which could arguably account for this Wordsworths work being written before the Industrial Revolution and Blake at its height.