Tuesday, March 19, 2019
No Harm Can Come to a Good Man Essay -- Philosophy Religion Essays
No Harm Can Come to a Good Man Whether Socrates is envisioned correctly or not, he currently was a bang-up reality. His persona to western thought cannot be denied. For even if his teachings were different from what they are cognise to be at present, his influence on Plato is im custodyse. And so, it is no small event to describe the tragic passing of such a man as Socrates was and remains for philosophy today. Yet in all the indignation which is pass judgment to arise at the death of Socrates, the panache with which he departs is captured excellently in Platos Apology. Specifically, at the end of the Apology, Socrates makes a very important statement that has had great impact on philosophy ever since its original proclamation. The Stoics in special wipe out taken this to be the cornerstone of their ideology. The statement made is that you moldiness regard one thing at least as certainthat no harm can come to a good man either in his life or after his death, (Plato 100 ). The following query focuses therefore on a brief explanation of the circumstances which pencil lead to this statement being made by Socrates, as well as a closer look at why he thinks this to be the case. It is assumed that this statement is true, and validation for that assumption is to be sought as well.So, first, why does Socrates make such a bold statement? verily it is nothing short of his own death sentence. The people who accused and voted against Socrates, have decreed it that he is to die for impiety toward the divinitys and of corrupting the youth (Plato), in addition, it is known that Socrates has as a companion of sorts a prophetic phonation to keep his philosophical endeavors regulated. Socrates himself states that this presence has not opposed him at an... ... is safely sustained. Ultimately, the lack of knowledge on the subject of death is no causal agent for its presumption to have any negative connotation. Thus Socrates leaves the people and the men of t he jury, pronouncing that it is time for us to gome to my death, you to your lives. Which of us goes to the better fate, only god knows, (Plato 100).Works Cited Aurelius, Marcus. Meditations. antediluvian Philosophy. 3rd Ed. Philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. Upper Saddle River scholar Hall, 2000.Epictetus. Encheiridion. Ancient Philosophy. 31 Ed. Philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2000.Plato. Apology. Ancient Philosophy. 3rd Ed. Philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2000. 82-100.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.